Agentic system threat review
Before launch or before expanding an agent's tools, memory, spend or data access.
Evidence delivered: Trust-boundary model, authority inventory, ranked abuse cases and a sequenced control plan.
Bounded services / evidence-led delivery
Choose the smallest review that can change a decision.
Every engagement begins with an owner, an explicit question and a bounded scope. Active testing requires written Rules of Engagement.
Assurance services
Production assurance review
For a release candidate or production system with an owner who can authorize bounded testing.
Evidence delivered: Evidence-backed findings, attack paths, remediation guidance, decision brief and one verification round.
Remediation verification
For teams that already have findings and need an independent, fixed-scope closure record.
Evidence delivered: Evidence comparison and a finding-by-finding state: fixed, mitigated, accepted or still open.
Security operating system
For teams that need security to become part of delivery rather than a periodic audit event.
Evidence delivered: Risk ownership, minimum controls, release gates, vulnerability intake, incident paths and evidence cadence.
AI agent security assessment: what it answers
Who can act?
Map human, service and agent identities, delegated permissions and revocation paths before authority becomes an incident.
What can the agent change?
Review MCP tools, APIs, data, memory, egress and side effects at action time — not only in prompts or static configuration.
What proves the answer?
Leave reproducible evidence, an owner for each finding, a remediation path and one agreed verification step.
MCP security review is a bounded option
When an MCP server is in scope, the review can inspect its discovery metadata, tool contracts, authorization, validation, side effects, egress and recovery boundary. Written Rules of Engagement are required before active testing.
What every review leaves behind
- Scope, assumptions, exclusions and evidence limitations.
- System and trust-boundary model tied to business impact.
- Findings with severity, confidence, reproduction and ownership.
- Remediation ordered by exploitability and consequence.
- A repeatable verification record instead of a vague “fixed” claim.
Start with the agent security guide
Before choosing a service, use the field guides to frame the system, authority, MCP surface and evidence that will change your decision.
Hard boundaries
Delx Security does not perform unbounded testing, certify whole organizations, guarantee security or treat a framework mapping as legal compliance.
Denial of service, destructive testing, persistence, social engineering and third-party targets are excluded unless the exact technique and owner authorization are separately written.
Ready to frame the question?